> Data > NORTH EAST  
nezine.com Bureau
Date of Publish: 2021-04-24

Climate change vulnerability: Mizoram, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh categorised as states with high vulnerability in National Climate Vulnerability Assessment Report

Three north-eastern states -Mizoram, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh are found to be highly vulnerable to climate change “requiring prioritisation of adaptation interventions”. A report titled “Climate Vulnerability Assessment For Adaptation Planning in India Using a Common Framework” has listed these three states in the category of “States with a relatively high vulnerability.” Other five states in the category are Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and West Bengal.

Three other states in the region - Tripura, Meghalaya and Manipur are included in the category of states with moderately vulnerability. Two other north-eastern states Sikkim and Nagaland have been categorised as states with low vulnerability.

“This ranking is based on quantified impacts of extreme weather events in terms of fatalities as well as economic losses that have occurred during 1999-2018”, states the report released by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India. The report has been submitted by the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Mandi and IIT, Guwahati In collaboration with the Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru under the Under the project “Climate vulnerability and risk assessment at the national level using a common framework.”

“The project and the present report are targeted to enhance the capacities of the government departments, academic and public institutions and to assist them in making informed decisions regarding adaptation planning and investment. The target group included national and state government departments, funding agencies, legislators, bureaucrats, local administration, and the general audience”, it adds.

Vulnerability Indices of states, their ranking, and categorisation.

States

Vulnerability

Indices

Ranking

Relative Vulnerability Category

Jharkhand

0.674

1

High vulnerability

Mizoram

0.645

2

High vulnerability

Orissa

0.633

3

High vulnerability

Chhattisgarh

0.623

4

High vulnerability

Assam

0.620

5

High vulnerability

Bihar

0.614

6

High vulnerability

Arunachal Pradesh

0.594

7

High vulnerability

West Bengal

0.592

8

High vulnerability

Uttar Pradesh

0.582

9

Moderate vulnerability

Tripura

0.571

10

Moderate vulnerability

Gujarat

0.562

11

Moderate vulnerability

Meghalaya

0.560

12

Moderate vulnerability

Erstwhile Jammu

&Kashmir

0.550

13

Moderate vulnerability

Rajasthan

0.535

14

Moderate vulnerability

Madhya Pradesh

0.528

15

Moderate vulnerability

Manipur

0.520

16

Moderate vulnerability

Andhra Pradesh

0.510

17

Moderate vulnerability

Karnataka

0.503

18

Moderate vulnerability

Himachal Pradesh

0.486

19

Low vulnerability

Telangana

0.480

20

Low vulnerability

Sikkim

0.477

21

Low vulnerability

Punjab

0.472

22

Low vulnerability

Uttarakhand

0.468

23

Low vulnerability

Haryana

0.463

24

Low vulnerability

Tamil Nadu

0.462

25

Low vulnerability

Kerala

0.437

26

Low vulnerability

Nagaland

0.437

27

Low vulnerability

Goa

0.434

28

Low vulnerability

Maharastra

0.419

29

Low vulnerability

 

The Report also includes a state-wise detailed list of drivers that lead to climate vulnerability. In case of most north-eastern states, very low coverage of crop insurance has been identified as a major driver of climate vulnerability.

Drivers

States

Major drivers:

Other drivers

Mizoram

  1. High yield-variability of food grains
  2. very low coverage of crop insurance
  3. prevalence of rain-fed agriculture
  4. high incidence of vector-borne diseases.
  1. High share of income from natural resources (agriculture and allied services)
  2. low road density
  3. lack of railway network.
  4. Note-despite highest density of health care workers per thousand population, less than 8% are doctors among them

Assam

  1. Very low coverage of crop insurance
  2. prevalence of rainfed agriculture
  3. lack of forest area per 1,000 rural population
  4. low number of health care workers.

 

Arunachal Pradesh

  1. High proportion of natural resource-based income
  2. very low coverage of crop insurance
  3. lack of implementation of MGNREGA,
  4. low road density
  5. lack of rail network.
  1. High proportion of BPL population
  2. prevalence of Rainfed agriculture.

Tripura

  1. Prevalence of marginal and small landholdings
  2. very low coverage of crop insurance
  3. high incidence of vector-borne diseases

 

Meghalaya

  1. Very low coverage of crop insurance
  2. low number of health care workers
  3. high incidence of both water and vector-borne diseases.

 

Manipur

  1. High proportion of BPL population
  2. very low coverage of crop insurance
  3. prevalence of rain-fed agriculture.

 

Sikkim

  1. Low dependence on horticultureespecially perennial fruit trees in agriculture
  2. prevalence of rainfed agriculture
  3. very low coverage of crop insurance
  4. high incidence water-borne diseases

 

Nagaland

  1. Very low coverage of crop insurance
  2. prevalence of rain-fed agriculture.

 

nezine.com Bureau

Comment


Saurav Kumar Chaliha’s shortstories
Twisted-20
Wooden Sculptural Art of Barpeta Kirtanghar: Synthesis of visual languages of folk culture and scriptures make the fables come alive
Creative works from Northeast:Papari Barman on Nandita Devi’s novel Bangal Bohu Dur
‘Mrigtrishna’- Narrating Familiar Tale in an Unfamiliar Way
Cartoon of the week ( February 1)
Dibru-Saikhowa, Baghjan and the politics of ecological conservation